Tue, 21-Oct-2025

PHC upholds sentences awarded by military courts

PHC

PESHAWAR: The Peshawar High Court (PHC) has upheld the convictions awarded by military courts, dismissing appeals filed against the sentences. A two-member bench comprising Justice Sahibzada Asadullah and Justice Fazal Subhan heard the appeals challenging the verdicts issued by the military courts. During the proceedings, the Additional Attorney General argued that the convicts were affiliated … Read more

SC conditionally allows military courts to pronounce verdict of 85 civilians

SC allows

ISLAMABAD: The Supreme Court of Pakistan (SCP) on Friday allowed the military courts conditional permission to pronounce verdicts in the cases against 85 civilians alleged involved in the May 9, cases.

The Constitutional Bench of the Supreme Court, headed by Justice Aminuddin Khan, heard the intra-court appeals against the decision of the military courts. The bench also included Justice Jamal Khan Mandokhail, Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Justice Syed Hasan Azhar Rizvi, Justice Naeem Akhtar Afghan, Justice Musarrat Hilali and Justice Shahid Bilal Hassan.

Announcing a short verdict on permission for the military courts to announce verdicts in the cases. Khawaja Haris, counsel for the Ministry of Defence, gave arguments.

At the beginning of the hearing, Jamal Khan Mandokhail remarked that the invalid provisions of the Army Act are in accordance with the Constitution. “Can the Army Act be amended to bring everyone under its category and asso take into account the fact that the Army Act predates the 1973 Constitution.

Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar asked, “First tell us what are the reasons for canceling the provisions in the court decision”.  Khawaja Haris replied that there are flaws in the Supreme Court’s decision.

Justice Musarrat Hilali, a member of the constitutional bench, asked what will happen to the trial under the provisions which have been declared null and void.

At the end of the hearing, the Constitutional Bench issued an order for today’s hearing in the case and allowed the military courts to pronounce the verdicts of 85 accused.

The Constitutional Bench said that the decisions of the military courts will be subject to the verdict of the case pending in the Supreme Court. The accused who can get a relief in the sentences should be released, and the accused who cannot be released should be sent to prisons.

[embedpost slug=”sc-restores-adil-bazai-as-mna”]

Read more

SC rejects plea seeking transfer of detainees in normal jail

SC

ISLAMABAD: The Supreme Court(SC) on Tuesday rejected the plea to transfer the detainees to normal jails in the case of trials of civilians in military courts.

A 7-member constitutional bench of the Supreme Court heard the case of the civilian trial in the military courts, in which Pakistan Tehreek Insaf’s lawyer Latif Khosa and the Additional Attorney General appeared in the court.

During the hearing, lawyer Latif Khosa said that at least the detainees can be met in the jails, on which Justice Aminuddin Khan said that the Attorney General has given assurances regarding the meeting.

The court rejected Latif Khosa’s plea to transfer the detainees to regular jails.

During the hearing, Additional Attorney General told the court that defence ministry lawyer Khawaja Haris is unwell and he has stomach problem due to which he cannot appear in the court, so the hearing should be postponed.

The court accepted the request of the Additional Attorney General to adjourn the hearing and adjourned the further hearing of the case till Thursday.

[embedpost slug=”sc-dismisses-govt-plea-seeking-permission-for-military-court-to-announce-judgments”]

Read more

SC dismisses govt plea seeking permission for military court to announce judgments

SC

ISLAMABAD: The Supreme Court (SC) rejected the federal government’s plea to allow military courts to announce case judgments.

A 7-member constitutional bench of the Supreme Court, headed by Justice Aminuddin Khan, heard the petitions related to the military courts to announce case verdicts.

Justice Musarrat Hilali remarked that allowing military courts to adjudicate cases would mean recognizing the authority of military courts.

The constitution bench rejected the government’s request to allow military courts to announce the cases judgment.

A constitution bench of the Supreme Court adjourned till tomorrow the hearing on pleas related to trial of civilians in military courts.

On the other hand, Constitutional Bench of the Supreme Court of Pakistan has rejected petitions to suspend hearing of appeals against trials of civilian under Army Act until the court decides the fate of the petitions against 26th Constitutional Amendment.

The seven-member Constitutional Bench of the Supreme Court, headed by Justice Amin-ud-Din Khan was hearing a petition, filed by the former Chief Justice of Pakistan Justice Jawad S Khwaja, not to hear the petition regarding trial of civilian under military act until the court concludes hearing of the pleas against 26th Constitutional Amendment.

The court also slapped a fine of Rs20,000 on the former chief justice.

Responding to a question, counsel for Justice Jawad S Khwaja argued before the Court that the Constitutional Bench, hearing the said petition, is constituted under the 26 Constitutional Amendment that is already challenged in the Court.

What will be the fate of its judgment if the SCP undo 26 Amendment. The Counsel said he can’t accept the jurisdiction of the Constitutional Bench until the SCP decides the petition against 26 Amendment.

The Court was annoyed with the statement and advised the lawyer to leave the court if he doesn’t accept it. The Court imposed a fine of Rs20000 on the petitioner terming his petition an attempt to delay the proceedings.

Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar remarked that even if the Court undo the 26 Amendment, judgments of the Constitutional Bench will remain protected.

Justice Jamal Mandokhail observed that the Constitutional Bench is working under the 26 Amendment and the petition against the said Amendment will be heard by the same Bench.

[embedpost slug=”supreme-court-constitutional-bench-addresses-missing-persons-case”]

Read more

SC grants conditional permission to military courts verdicts

SC grants

ISLAMABAD: The Supreme Court (SC) granted military courts conditional permission to announce reserved verdicts against civilians facing trial in May 9 incidents.

The bench, led by Justice Aminuddin Khan and including Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Justice Syed Hasan Azhar Rizvi, Justice Shahid Waheed, Justice Mussarat Hilali, and Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, heard intra-court appeals against the decision of its five-member bench nullifying an earlier apex court decision declaring military trials of civilians unconstitutional.

The Attorney General told the court that a total of 105 accused are in the custody of the army, among them there are 20 people who can be released before Eid. For the release of these 20 persons, there are 3 stages that will have to be followed.

The Attorney General further said that the first step for the release of the accused would be the pronouncement of a reserved decision, the second step would be its confirmation and the third step would be to grant concessions to those with lesser sentences by the Army Chief.

Meanwhile, the Attorney General requested the military courts to allow the reserved judgments, to which the court said that even if the permission is granted, it will be subject to the final decision of the appeals.

The court asked the attorney general to give the names of those who are to be released, the attorney general said that he cannot give the names until the decisions are received from the military courts, those whose sentence is one year will be given concession.

The court said that the Attorney General had assured that statutory concessions would be granted to those with lesser sentences, allowing the verdict to be delivered subject to the final decision on appeals.

Later, the Supreme Court gave conditional permission to military courts to pronounce reserved judgments and said that judgments should be pronounced only in those cases in which the nominees can be released before Eid.

[embedpost slug=”sc-full-court-discusses-ihc-judges-letter-about-spy-agencies-interference”]

Read more

Sindh Govt files plea challenging SC’s military courts ruling

Sindh
  • Sindh government requested Supreme Court to annul decision.
  • It is requested to restore invalid provisions of Official Secrets Act.
  • Accused of attacks on installations should be tried in military courts.

ISLAMABAD: The interim Sindh government filed an intra-court appeal challenging the apex court’s October 23 judgment, declaring the trial of civilians in military courts unconstitutional.

The Sindh government has requested the Supreme Court to annul the decision.

In the petition, it is requested to restore the invalid provisions of the Army Act and the Official Secrets Act.

The Sindh government has also requested to suspend the decision of the Supreme Court on October 23 till the decision.

According to the request, the accused of attacks on military installations should be tried in military courts, the Supreme Court did not properly review the law and facts.

It has been stated in the petition that the accused themselves requested that their trial be conducted in military courts.

[embedpost slug=”notice-issued-on-pti-chairmans-plea-seeking-production-in-may-25-cases”]

Read more