Tue, 21-Oct-2025

Google Ads | Google Ads | Google Ads | Google Ads | Google Ads | Google Ads | Google Ads | Google Ads

Zara brand name question not fair, shop proprietor tells council

Zara

Zara brand name question not fair, shop proprietor tells council

An entrepreneur secured in a brand name tussle with High Street monster Zara let a council know there was “no probability” of befuddling the brands.

Golden Kotrri, who runs Darlington-based House of Zana, was told by attorneys for the retailer in 2021 that her business was “adroitly indistinguishable”.

At the court, Zara contended there was a “serious level of visual and oral similitudes” between the two brands.

In any case, Mrs Kotrri countered that the case was “not sensible or fair”.

During the extended hearing, Zara’s lawyer, Julia King, presented that the House of Zana brand name application ought to be rejected in light of the fact that it was too comparative in name, which could bring about clients mistaking one brand name for another.

Ms King said the word Zana was “one little brush mark” away from Zara and added “Place of” was a typical term utilized by “many gatherings” as an approach to alluding to mold organizations.

She added that the County Durham-based brand was “not particular and just graphic” and could represent a “genuine danger” to Zara in the event that the market was packed with brands that looked and sounded comparative.

The point was questioned by Mrs Kotrri who concurred Zara had a standing as a worldwide brand, however said there was no likeness with her business’ name.

She said: “My business has never been alluded to Zana without the words ‘Place of’, my rivals guarantee there is a serious level of comparability however they are disregarding the brand as entire and that is ‘Place of Zana’.

“It has never been alluded to as Zana, just ever as HOZ on my web-based entertainment takes care of.”

Mrs Kotrri added that Zara had neglected to give proof to demonstrate purchasers would find House of Zana misdirecting, and that it was obvious to clients there was “no resistance”.

She has recently blamed Zara for “extremely scary” lead in its dealings with her.

Ms King said it was “not significant” to the court that Mrs Kotrri’s business was little and the legitimate activity didn’t have anything to do with “needing to shut down a private venture”.

A choice on Mrs Kotrri’s brand name application is supposed to made before very long.