• Prince Harry should not be invited to the coronation because he is not regretful.
• Harry’s attacks haven’t simply damaged members of the Royal Family.
• Prince Harry’s attacks on the Royal Family have damaged the institution in general.

An expert has recently clapped back at Prince Harry and feels the “lavish prince” should not get an invitation to King Charles‘ coronation because he shows “no evidence of being regretful.”

This was revealed by author Stephen Glover in his most recent column for the publication.

Mr. Glover feels that “there’s no evidence that Harry is remotely contrite.” More books and doubtless further television interviews and self-serving documentaries lie ahead, and neither Harry nor his wife show any sign of intending to desist.”

Because of this, “It is surely unimaginable, though, that this could happen without an assurance from Harry and Meghan that their broadsides will cease for good—and it seems extremely unlikely that such an undertaking will ever be given by the vengeful Sussexes.”

At the end of the day, “King Charles is not simply a loving father.” He is also our sovereign, who is aware that he must sometimes look beyond the personal feelings of members of his family to consider the interests of the monarchy.

[embedpost slug=”/king-charles-wants-his-sons-and-grandchildren-at-his-coronation/”]

“Harry’s attacks haven’t simply damaged members of the Royal Family.” There has been wider collateral damage to the institution, which, with breathtaking arrogance and presumptuousness, Harry says he has a “responsibility” to reform.