- Prince Harry should not be invited to the coronation of Charles and Camilla.
- Because he shows ‘no signs of being remorseful’ for his part in the Hatton Garden affair.
- This was revealed by author Stephen Glover in his most recent source piece.
An expert has recently spoken out against Prince Harry, claiming that the ‘lavish prince’ should not be invited to King Charles‘ coronation because he shows ‘no signs of being remorseful’.
This was revealed by author Stephen Glover in his most recent source piece.
“There’s no evidence that Harry is remotely contrite. More books, and doubtless further television interviews and self-serving documentaries, lie ahead, and neither Harry nor his wife shows any sign of intending to desist,” Mr Glover believes.
The author writes, “It is surely unimaginable, though, that this could happen without an assurance from Harry and Meghan that their broadsides will cease for good — and it seems extremely unlikely that such an undertaking will ever be given by the vengeful Sussexes.”
At the end of the day, “Charles is not simply a loving father. He is also our sovereign, who is aware that he must sometimes look beyond the personal feelings of members of his family to consider the interests of the monarchy.”
“For Harry’s attacks haven’t simply damaged members of the Royal Family. There has been wider collateral damage to the institution, which, with breathtaking arrogance and presumptuousness, Harry says he has a ‘responsibility’ to reform.”
[embedpost slug=”/king-charles-wants-his-sons-and-grandchildren-at-his-coronation/”]
