- Angela Epstein, a royal biographer and author, shared these thoughts in her new piece for the media.
- The first thing he said was, “I recently wondered, in this paper, why Meghan and Harry had insisted on clinging to their royal titles
- But the devil roared back that, having lost their HRH, the fancy pants title was a commercial little number.
It is said that Prince Harry has put King Charles in a painful game of “tit-for-tat.”
Angela Epstein, a royal biographer and author, shared these thoughts in her new piece for the media.
The first thing he said was, “I recently wondered, in this paper, why Meghan and Harry had insisted on clinging to their royal titles.”
“The angel in my head pondered whether it had sprouted from a sense of affection for the Queen, who had bequeathed the honour of the Duke and Duchess of Sussex as a wedding gift.”
“But the devil roared back that, having lost their HRH, the fancy pants title was a commercial little number, useful in maintaining their marketability, and too good to cast away.”
[embedpost slug=”/camilla-fell-back-into-charles-arms-because-of-her-ex/”]
“That’s why King Charles shouldn’t wait for the inevitable—not least because it is unseemly for our King to become entangled in a painful game of tit-for-tat.” “You show me up, son, and I’ll show you out.”
